While watching a video by Bill Nye on axial precession’s effect on astrology, I was troubled by my visualization of his explanation. Not that I have an issue with axial precession, just it’s relation to the position of the Sun. In case you’re not familiar, let me begin with the definition of the precession.
In addition to the spinning of the Earth, The earth has a wobble. Imagine a fast spinning top that slowly wobbles. That’s a sped-up version of the Earth’s motion. Over the timespan of about every 26,000 years, the earth completes one axial precession or “wobble”.
In his video, Bill Nye explains that the position of the Sun in relation to the constellations has changed since astrology came about around 2000 years ago. This is where my visualization conflicts with what I’ve heard of the axial precession.
I understand that our perception of the stars’ positions should shift along the precession. What doesn’t make sense though, is the notion that a change in axial tilt would account for a lineal change of the Sun in relation to the stars. It seems to me that such an effect would have to occur from a wobble in the Earth’s orbital plane, not just the Earth itself.
I’ll be doing some research to, hopefully, better understand the precession and its relation to the position of the Sun and stars. If you have any information or resources that will help me explain the discrepancy, please let me know.
-Scott Jordan
Bill Nye’s Video
watch?v=1PNJtmizCUQ



